The key real question is whether or not the additional work adds helpful value, states Timothy Gowers, a mathematician at the University of Cambr >Nature http://doi.org/kwd; 2012). Would experts' admiration for registration journals hold up if expenses had been taken care of because of the writers, instead of spread among readers? If you see it through the viewpoint for the publisher, you'll feel quite hurt, says Gowers. You'll believe that a complete large amount of work you place in isn't valued by experts. The question that is real whether that really work is required, and that is a lot less apparent.
Many scientists in areas such as for instance math, high-energy physics and computer technology usually do not believe it is. They post pre- and post-reviewed variations of the work with servers such as for example arXiv an operation that costs some $800,000 a to keep going, or about $10 per article year.